What Is The Difference Between Apache Storm And Apache Spark?
Let us
first discuss the similarities between Apache Storm and Apache Spark: Streaming
jobs for both of these run until there is an unrecoverable failure or shutdown
by user. Both of these are implemented in JVM based language. Scala and clojure
are the two respective JVM languages.
Differences
between Apache Spark and Apache Storm are as follows:
On the basis of definition:
S.No
|
Apache Spark
|
Apache Storm
|
1
|
It is an open
source processing engine that provides an interface for programming entire
cluster with implicit fault-tolerance and data parallelism.
|
Storm is simple and easy to reliably process
the unbound streams of data.
|
2
|
It is a general purpose batch processing engine.
|
It is a task parallel continuous engine
|
3
|
Defines its workflow in DAGs called
topologies.
|
Defines its workflow in style of MapReduce.
|
4
|
Executing applications run on own server
processes.
|
It uses Apache ZooKeeper and its own minion
worker processes.
|
5
|
Spark can run on Mesos clusters
|
Storm can run on top of Mesos scheduler.
|
On the basis of development:
S.No
|
Apache Spark
|
Apache Storm
|
1
|
It is a top level Apache Project
|
It is currently undergoing incubation
|
2
|
Latest stable version is 1.0.2
|
Latest stable version is 0.9.2
|
3
|
Reflect stability
|
Does not reflect completeness or stability
|
4
|
Endorsed by Apache Software Foundation
|
Still working on its development process
|
5
|
Guarantee stability in API
|
No guarantee stability in its API
|
On the basis of velocity:
S.No
|
Apache Spark
|
Apache Storm
|
1
|
As per the graph the commit velocity over
last month has been over 330 commits.
|
As per the graph the commit velocity over
last month has been over 70 commits.
|
2
|
As per JIRA chart spark has huge volumes of
issues reported.
|
As per JIRA chart storm has an order of
magnitude less of issues reported.
|
Difference on the basis of Installation:
S.No
|
Apache Spark
|
Apache Storm
|
1
|
Installation is simple
|
Installation is though simple but complex in
respect of spark
|
2
|
Spark application technically just require
spark assembly to be present
|
Storm requires ZooKeeper to be properly
installed
|
Differences on the basis of Fault tolerance:
S.No.
|
Apache Spark
|
Apache Storm
|
1
|
Resiliency built in Spark’s RDD yields
trivial mechanism for fault tolerance.
|
For fault tolerance Storm keeps the track of
each and every record.
|
2
|
Micro-batching yields a message delivery
guarantees
|
Data loss is acceptable
|
3.
|
Failure scenarios is degrade to at least one
delivery
|
Incur latency costs
|
Differences on the basis of Applicability:
S.No.
|
Apache Spark
|
Apache Storm
|
1
|
Proves to be an excellent model for
performing interactive analytics, visualized interactive analytics and iterative
machine learning.
|
Excels in ingestion, real time analytics,
data normalization, natural language processing and ETL transformations.
|
2
|
Excels in ingestion and real time analytics.
|
Yields fine gained transformation and
flexible topologies.
|
On the basis of
Latency:
S.No.
|
Apache Spark
|
Apache Storm
|
1
|
Latency rate is high
|
Give sub second latency
|
2
|
More restrictions
|
Less restrictions
|
With the arrival of concept of Big Data and the increasing need of better
handling of Big Data, it has become really important to acquire expertise in
technologies like Apache Spark. To take a technological lead, enroll yourself
right away to a Spark training in Bangalore and become a professional.
Comments
Post a Comment